(Intel + Linux) vs (Sun + Solaris)
by Mo Martin <mo_ee(at)bigfoot.com>
|
Date: |
Fri, 12 Apr 2002 17:03:24 -0700 |
To: |
hwg-servers(at)hwg.org |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
We're running into capacity limits on our web hardware and my head
technical guy is suggesting a switch from Solaris running on Sun
hardware to Linux running on Intel processors. I trust him but want
some additional opinions.
It's a mid-sized corporate site serving about a million visitors a
month. 4M pages a month about 50-75% of which are fed from the
database. Steady, predictable growth but quite rapid -- more than
doubling each year. The site serves pages and data sheets, no
transactions or e-commerce.
We run three Solaris machines (Sun CPUs) now but one does all the
work. It runs Sybase 7 and Cold Fusion 4.5, and Apache. It's a
three-year-old old machine with dual 330 MHz processors. The other
machines are single-processor 300 MHz versions just serving HTML,
mail, and PDFs. One also runs Lyris, a list server, at fairly low
volume. All the machines are at a co-lo -- we own and run them, they
house them and provide bandwidth.
The choice is between buying a newer Sun server and RAID array; or
going with a 2.2 GHz Pentium 4 with RAID array for around $4500.
He also is suggesting we consolidate our processes. We have Cold
Fusion and Sybase on one machine; and two separate machines sharing
the HTML serving and mail functions. He wants to put it all on one
box (and use the old boxes as spares/backups).
Primary desire is for reliability and performance.
Thoughts?
HWG: hwg-servers mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA